Thorudottir, S., Ásgeirsson, Á. G., & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2024, June 9). Visual imagery vividness appears to be independent of perceptual and memory precision. Retrieved from

Makarov. I, Unnthorsson, R., Kristjánsson, Á. & Thornton, I.M. (2024, January, 11). Cross-modal cues improve the detection of synchronized targets during human foraging. Retrieved from

Sigurdardottir, H. M. & Ólafsdóttir, I. M. (2023, October 2). Objects, faces, and spaces: Organizational principles of visual object perception as evidenced by individual differences in behavior. Retrieved from

Jozranjbar, B., Kristjánsson, Á., Gerlach, C., & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2023, June 22). The impact of visual working memory constraints on object recognition. Retrieved from

Kristjánsson, T., Draschkow, D., Pálsson, Á., Haraldsson, D., Jónsson, P.O. & Kristjánsson, Á. (2020, May 1). Moving foraging into 3D: Feature versus conjunction-based foraging in virtual reality. Retrieved from:

Tanrikulu, Ö.D., Chetverikov, A., Hansmann-Roth, S. & Kristjánsson, Á. (2019, Dec 5). Is there empirical support for probabilistic mental representations? A case within visual perception. Retrieved from:

Sigurjonsdottir, Ó., Björnsson, A.S., Wessman, I. & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018, August 5).  Measuring biases of visual attention: A comparison of 4 tasks. Retrieved from: 

Thornton, I. M., de’Sperati, C., & Kristjansson, A. (2019, May 20). The influence of selection modality, display dynamics and error feedback on patterns of human foraging. Retrieved from:

Chetverikov, A., Campana, G. & Kristjánsson, Á. (2018, June 25). Probabilistic rejection templates in visual working memory. Retrieved from: